接下来我们拿一道tpo真题举例：

Only rarely can we derive any "real" quantities from deposits of broken pots. However, there is one exceptional dump, which does represent a very large part of the site`s total history of consumption and for which an estimate of quantity has been produced. On the left bank of the Tiber River in Rome, by one of the river ports of the ancient city, is a substantial hill some 50 meters high called Monte Testaccio. It is made up entirely of broken oil amphorae, mainly of the second and third centuries A.D. It has been estimated that Monte Testaccio contains the remains of some 53 million amphorae, in which around 6,000 million liters of oil were imported into the city from overseas. Imports into imperial Rome were supported by the full might of the state and were therefore quite exceptional-but the size of the operations at Monte Testaccio, and the productivity and complexity that lay behind them, nonetheless cannot fail to impress. This was a society with similarities to modern ones-moving goods on a gigantic scale, manufacturing high-quality containers to do so, and occasionally, as here, even discarding them on delivery.

According to paragraph 4, Monte Testaccio is particularly important for archaeologists because archaeologists were able to

•A conclude how amphorae manufacturing increased rapidly after the second century A.D.

•B find the locations where most of the amphorae in the Roman Empire were produced

•C obtain relatively accurate calculations of the quantities of amphorae used over time in that place

•D discover that the Roman state had supported amphorae production

这套题很明显在问Monte Testaccio对考古学家的重要性，所以很多学生直接拿Monte Testaccio去定位，甚至去找archaeologists，结果找不到archaeologists，并且从第三句开始描绘的Monte Testaccio到最后读完根本选不出答案，所以这个时候千万不能忽视本段的主旨句，或者论点句，也就是第一句和第二句，第一句说很难从broken pots上来推断那个时期pots的产量，第二句转折说有个例外，也就是第三句的Monte Testaccio，即在Monte Testaccio，考古学家可以推断是当时pots的产量，答案选C。

总而言之，如果你想保证阅读高分，那么只关注句子读懂这一个层面是不不够的，你还要精准理解常考逻辑与结构到底是什么，比如要理解段落主旨和细节的关系，段落逻辑走向以及文章逻辑脉络，多总结整理，你一定能发现新大陆！